Historical HMIS 35 and 36: Understanding Inpatient Registers in Nepal
A field guide to two uploaded inpatient registers labelled HMIS 35 and 36, with current cautions about numbering, data quality, confidentiality and reporting use.
Editorial context
Adapted from an uploaded spreadsheet containing blank inpatient registers labelled HMIS 35 and HMIS 36. Current official Nepal HMIS tools use chapter-based numbering, and these flat form numbers were not verified in the current catalogue. This article explains the supplied historical forms but does not reproduce or endorse them as current official templates.
Key points
- In the uploaded workbook, HMIS 35 records admission and HMIS 36 records discharge; those labels are historical and unverified against the current catalogue.
- A unique admission number should link entries across the inpatient record system.
- Diagnosis, length of stay and discharge outcome require consistent definitions and validation.
- Registers contain identifiable health information and must never be published as open data.
- Facilities must use the latest forms, codes and reporting instructions issued through official HMIS channels.
What the two uploaded registers capture
In the uploaded workbook, the sheet labelled HMIS 35 is an admission register for inpatients. It records the admission serial number and date, referral source, patient and guardian details, address, occupation, age and sex, birth status where applicable, provisional diagnosis, payment status and remarks.
The sheet labelled HMIS 36 is a discharge register. It records admission and discharge dates, duration of stay, admission number, patient details, age group and sex, main diagnosis at discharge, operation, type of care, delivery and birth status, discharge condition, timing of death and remarks.
These labels do not match the current chapter-based numbering visible in Nepal’s official HMIS catalogue. Treat them as archival labels unless an authorized HMIS office confirms their edition and status.
Follow one inpatient episode from entry to exit
The admission number is the key operational link between the admission register, clinical record and discharge register. Staff should record it consistently and verify dates so length of stay is plausible.
The provisional diagnosis at admission may change after assessment. The main diagnosis at discharge should reflect the condition chiefly responsible for the admission under the current coding and reporting instructions, not simply repeat an unconfirmed entry diagnosis.
Understand the outcome fields
The supplied discharge form includes outcomes such as recovered, not improved, referred, left against medical advice, absconded and died. These categories require current operational definitions so different wards and facilities classify the same event consistently.
Death within or after 48 hours, live birth and stillbirth are sensitive indicators. Validate dates, times and definitions against the current national guidance before aggregation, and use clinical review processes rather than the register alone to understand quality or preventability.
Build data quality into daily work
Complete the register as close to the event as possible from an authorized source record. Use approved codes and avoid inventing abbreviations. Supervisors should review missing fields, duplicate admission numbers, impossible dates, inconsistent age and sex entries, and mismatches between admission and discharge totals.
- Check that every discharged patient has a corresponding admission.
- Reconcile transfers, referrals, deaths and patients remaining at month-end.
- Confirm that duration of stay matches the dates and local counting rule.
- Review unusual changes before submitting summaries.
- Document corrections without obscuring the original audit trail.
Protect confidentiality
These registers contain names, addresses, diagnoses and other identifiable information. Keep paper registers in controlled areas and digital copies behind role-based access. Do not photograph, email or upload completed pages through unapproved channels.
Reports should use the minimum aggregated data required. Before sharing a table, assess whether a rare diagnosis, small location or unusual demographic combination could identify a patient. Training examples should be blank or safely synthetic.
Use registers for management—not only reporting
Reliable inpatient data can support bed planning, referral review, service-volume monitoring, mortality review, medicine planning and quality improvement. Interpret trends alongside staffing, case severity, referral patterns and changes in coding or service availability.
The uploaded forms are archival learning material. Before printing or implementing any register, obtain the latest approved form, metadata, reporting schedule and indicator definitions from Nepal’s official HMIS or Department of Health Services channel.
Sources and further reading
Use the linked institutions for current definitions, regulations, programmes and statistics.
- Department of Health Services Nepal
Official source for current programme, HMIS and annual-report materials.
- DoHS: HMIS recording and reporting forms
Current official catalogue showing chapter-based HMIS form numbering.
- Ministry of Health and Population Nepal
National authority for current health-sector policy and information standards.
- WHO: SCORE for Health Data Technical Package
Framework for strengthening country health information systems and data use.
- WHO: Guidance on ethical issues in public health surveillance
Ethical principles for collecting, protecting and using identifiable public-health data.
- PHC-Nepal: Health Management Information System in Nepal
Related guide to the wider HMIS information cycle and data-quality principles.
Related learning note
Health Systems & DataHealth Management Information System in Nepal: Data to DecisionsA practical guide to HMIS in Nepal: data collection, quality, reporting, interpretation and responsible use for planning and improving health services.Educational notice: This article summarizes historical and public-health material. It does not replace current national protocols, clinical judgement or care from a qualified professional.
